Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,511 · Q2 • database Scopus / SJR & DOAJ indexed
Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
China · Editorial Department of Acta...
workspace_premium Q2 — Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica

Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica is a journal indexed in SJR in Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) with an H index of 46. It is an CC BY-NC-ND Journal with a Double blind peer review review system, and It has a price of 78 €. The scope of the journal is focused on China, elementary surveying and topography, geodetic surveying, photogrammetry and remote sensing, cartography. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,511 and it has a best quartile of Q2. It is published in Chinese. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,511.

ISSN: 1001-1595
Publisher: Editorial Department of Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,511 Q2
H-index 46
Acceptance rate pie_chart
35%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
40 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
78 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,511

H-index

46

Docs (year)

225

Docs 3y

725

Total refs

6958

Cites 3y

1511

Citable 3y

656

Cites/Doc 2y

1.95

Ref/Doc

30.92

Immediate OA

78 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs