Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,129 · Q4 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
AMHA - Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica
Croatia · Croatian Scientific Society...
workspace_premium Q4 — Medicine (miscellaneous) verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

AMHA - Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica

AMHA - Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica is a journal indexed in SJR in Medicine (miscellaneous) with an H index of 12. It is an CC BY Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system The scope of the journal is focused on Central Europe, Adriatic region, history of medicine, history of health culture. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,129 and it has a best quartile of Q4. It is published in Croatian, English, German, Italian, Slovenian, Spanish; Castilian. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,129.

ISSN: 1334-4366
Publisher: Croatian Scientific Society for the History of Health
Category: Medicine (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,129 Q4
H-index 12
Acceptance rate pie_chart
52%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
36 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,129

H-index

12

Docs (year)

8

Docs 3y

60

Total refs

472

Cites 3y

9

Citable 3y

57

Cites/Doc 2y

0.16

Ref/Doc

59.0

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs