Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,179 · Q3 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Archives of Foundry Engineering
Poland · Polish Academy of Sciences,...
workspace_premium Q3 — Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Archives of Foundry Engineering

Archives of Foundry Engineering is a journal indexed in SJR in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Metals and Alloys with an H index of 18. It is an CC BY-NC-ND Journal with a Double blind peer review review system, and It has a price of 110 €. The scope of the journal is focused on foundry engineering, waste management, moulding, furnace, casting, cast alloys. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,179 and it has a best quartile of Q3. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,179.

ISSN: 1897-3310
Publisher: Polish Academy of Sciences, Katowice Branch
Category: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,179 Q3
H-index 18
Acceptance rate pie_chart
45%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
12 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
110 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,179

H-index

18

Docs (year)

61

Docs 3y

197

Total refs

1550

Cites 3y

130

Citable 3y

197

Cites/Doc 2y

0.55

Ref/Doc

25.41

Immediate OA

110 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs