Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,254 · Q2 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Bitacora Urbano Territorial
Colombia · Universidad Nacional de Colo...
workspace_premium Q2 — Geography, Planning and Development verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Bitacora Urbano Territorial

Bitacora Urbano Territorial is a journal indexed in SJR in Geography, Planning and Development and Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) with an H index of 11. It is an CC BY Journal with a Double blind peer review review system The scope of the journal is focused on habitat, territory, public policy, urban planning, architecture, vivienda. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,254 and it has a best quartile of Q2. It is published in English, Portuguese, Spanish; Castilian. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,254.

ISSN: 0124-7913
Publisher: Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Category: Geography, Planning and Development
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,254 Q2
H-index 11
Acceptance rate pie_chart
57%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
16 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,254

H-index

11

Docs (year)

32

Docs 3y

170

Total refs

1024

Cites 3y

86

Citable 3y

162

Cites/Doc 2y

0.41

Ref/Doc

32.0

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs