Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,975 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Cancer Imaging
United Kingdom · BioMed Central Ltd
workspace_premium Q1 — Medicine (miscellaneous) verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Cancer Imaging

Cancer Imaging is a journal indexed in SJR in Medicine (miscellaneous) and Oncology with an H index of 69. It is an CC BY + CC0 Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 1890 €. The scope of the journal is focused on CT, MRI, PET, malignant tumours, multimodal imaging, imaging biomarkers. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,975 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,975.

Cancer Imaging focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: hepatocellular, carcinoma, criteria, evaluation, response, diagnosis, parenchymal, monoexponential, adenocarcinomas, myelomaimaging, ...

ISSN: 1740-5025
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Category: Medicine (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,975 Q1
H-index 69
Acceptance rate pie_chart
30% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
9 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
1.890 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,975

H-index

69

Docs (year)

166

Docs 3y

265

Total refs

6630

Cites 3y

957

Citable 3y

264

Cites/Doc 2y

3.29

Ref/Doc

39.94

Immediate OA

1890 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs