Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,213 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Chinese Medical Journal
China · Lippincott Williams and Wilk...
workspace_premium Q1 — Medicine (miscellaneous) visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Chinese Medical Journal

Chinese Medical Journal is a journal indexed in SJR in Medicine (miscellaneous) with an H index of 84. It is an CC BY-NC-ND Journal with a Double blind peer review review system, and It has a price of 1800 €. The scope of the journal is focused on medical sciences, health. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,213 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,213.

Chinese Medical Journal focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: diagnosis, patients, tuberculosis, genotype, pregnancy, infected, previous, management, hepatocellular, proliferation, ...

ISSN: 0366-6999
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Category: Medicine (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,213 Q1
H-index 84
Acceptance rate pie_chart
28% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
17 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
1.800 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

1,213

H-index

84

Docs (year)

519

Docs 3y

1633

Total refs

18729

Cites 3y

5494

Citable 3y

969

Cites/Doc 2y

3.45

Ref/Doc

36.09

Immediate OA

1800 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs