Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,984 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Cryosphere
Germany · Copernicus Publications
workspace_premium Q1 — Water Science and Technology verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ Unclaimed

Cryosphere

Cryosphere is a journal indexed in SJR in Water Science and Technology and Earth-Surface Processes with an H index of 123. It is an CC BY Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 1000 €. The scope of the journal is focused on ice sheets and glaciers, planetary ice bodies, permafrost, river and lake ice, seasonal snowcover, sea ice. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,984 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,984.

Cryosphere focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: ice, glacier, balance, mass, surface, model, siberia, sheet, climate, models, ...

ISSN: 1994-0416
Editorial: Copernicus Publications
Category: Water Science and Technology
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guía para Autores (Guidelines)
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,984 Q1
H-index 123
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
25% Selectiva
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
37 semanas
Campo Average_time_publication_weeks
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
1.000 € Open Access
Ruta Non-OA NPD

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

1,984

H-index

123

Docs (year)

285

Docs 3y

843

Total refs

20638

Cites 3y

3885

Citable 3y

843

Cites/Doc 2y

4.26

Ref/Doc

72.41

Immediate OA

1000 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQS