Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,18 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed
Emerita / Junta para Ampliacion de Estudios, Centro de Estudios Historicos
Spain · CSIC Consejo Superior de Inv...
workspace_premium Q1 — Language and Linguistics verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access

Emerita / Junta para Ampliacion de Estudios, Centro de Estudios Historicos

Emerita / Junta para Ampliacion de Estudios, Centro de Estudios Historicos is a journal indexed in SJR in Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language with an H index of 6. It is an CC BY Journal with a Double blind peer review review system The scope of the journal is focused on classical philology, linguistics, ancient history. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,18 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in Spanish; Castilian. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,18.

ISSN: 0013-6662
Publisher: CSIC Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas
Category: Language and Linguistics
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,18 Q1
H-index 6
Acceptance rate pie_chart
63%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
48 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

0,18

H-index

6

Docs (year)

7

Docs 3y

41

Total refs

336

Cites 3y

8

Citable 3y

40

Cites/Doc 2y

0.19

Ref/Doc

48.0

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs