Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,352 · Q3 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal
Kazakhstan · Institute of Combustion Prob...
workspace_premium Q3 — Materials Science (miscellaneous) verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal

Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal is a journal indexed in SJR in Materials Science (miscellaneous) and Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous) with an H index of 17. It is an CC BY Journal with a Double blind peer review review system, and It has a price of 230 €. The scope of the journal is focused on new materials, physical chemistry, chemical physics, organic chemistry, nanotechnology, chemical technology. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,352 and it has a best quartile of Q3. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,352.

ISSN: 1562-3920
Publisher: Institute of Combustion Problems, al-Farabi Kazakh State National University
Category: Materials Science (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,352 Q3
H-index 17
Acceptance rate pie_chart
49%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
20 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
230 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,352

H-index

17

Docs (year)

32

Docs 3y

90

Total refs

1106

Cites 3y

129

Citable 3y

90

Cites/Doc 2y

1.87

Ref/Doc

34.56

Immediate OA

230 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs