verified SJR 1,361 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed

United Kingdom · NIHR Journals Library

workspace_premium Q1 — Medicine (miscellaneous) visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Health Technology Assessment

Health Technology Assessment is a journal indexed in SJR in Medicine (miscellaneous) and Health Policy with an H index of 145. It is an CC BY-NC Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system The scope of the journal is focused on healthcare, health technology, health technology effectiveness, health technology costs, technology impacts. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,361 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,361.

Health Technology Assessment focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: review, systematic, economic, trial, modelling, costeffectiveness, randomised, colorectal, cancer, controlled, ...

ISSN: 1366-5278

Publisher: NIHR Journals Library

Category: Medicine (miscellaneous)

Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines

schedule CountryOfPapers database fields

SJR Impact Factor trending_up

1,361 Q1

H-index 145

Acceptance rate pie_chart

22% Selective

Source Acceptance_Rate

Time to publication hourglass_top

53 weeks

Field Average_time_publication_weeks

Publication cost (APC) payments

NPD Open Access

Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

1,361

H-index

145

Docs (year)

Docs 3y

161

Total refs

8996

Cites 3y

645

Citable 3y

161

Cites/Doc 2y

3.56

Ref/Doc

111.06

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims

rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.

Publication speed *

Review quality *

Edition and editorial team *

Institutional email or ORCID * * Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Active Treatment for Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis (ACTIvATeS): a feasibility study

Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

Community provision of hearing aids and related audiology services.

Combination therapy (interferon alfa and ribavirin) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a rapid and systematic review.

Colistimethate sodium powder and tobramycin powder for inhalation for the treatment of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection in cystic fibrosis: systematic review and economic model

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of parenting interventions for children with severe attachment problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of once-daily versus more frequent use of same potency topical corticosteroids for atopic eczema: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.

Assessment of the feasibility and clinical value of further research to evaluate the management options for children with Down syndrome and otitis media with effusion: a feasibility study

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

An open randomised study of autoinflation in 4- to 11-year-old school children with otitis media with effusion in primary care

SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Amisulpride for very late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis: the ATLAS three-arm RCT

'Early warning systems' for identifying new healthcare technologies.

A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures

A systematic review of the clinical, public health and cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection and identification of bacterial intestinal pathogens in faeces and food

A systematic review and economic model of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of docetaxel in combination with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer

A systematic review and economic evaluation of intraoperative tests [RD-100i one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) system and Metasin test] for detecting sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer

A rapid and systematic review of the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

A randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus no scheduled follow-up in patients who have undergone resection for colorectal cancer with curative intent

A randomised controlled trial of prehospital intravenous fluid replacement therapy in serious trauma.

A randomised controlled trial of different approaches to universal antenatal HIV testing: uptake and acceptability and Annex: Antenatal HIV testing - assessment of a routine voluntary approach.

A feasibility study to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial to identify the most clinically effective and cost-effective length of Anticoagulation with Low-molecular-weight heparin In the treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (ALICA

A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment.

FAQs

Health Technology Assessment has an SJR of 1,361 (best quartile Q1) in the CountryOfPapers database.

Immediate OA APC is not available (NPD).

The acceptance rate recorded for Health Technology Assessment is 22%.

Health Technology Assessment

Metrics

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Researcher reviews

Best articles by citations

FAQs

What is the SJR of Health Technology Assessment?

What is the APC / publication cost?

What is the acceptance rate?