Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,16 · Q4 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences
United States · University of Georgia
workspace_premium Q4 — Forestry verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences

Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences is a journal indexed in SJR in Forestry and Applied Mathematics with an H index of 14. It is an CC BY Journal with a Double blind peer review review system, and It has a price of 360 €. The scope of the journal is focused on forest biometrics, modeling, growth and yield, simulations, operations research, resource management. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,16 and it has a best quartile of Q4. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,16.

Publisher: University of Georgia
Category: Forestry
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,16 Q4
H-index 14
Acceptance rate pie_chart
48%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
15 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
360 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,16

H-index

14

Docs (year)

4

Docs 3y

18

Total refs

114

Cites 3y

9

Citable 3y

18

Cites/Doc 2y

0.4

Ref/Doc

28.5

Immediate OA

360 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs