Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,661 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR indexed
Petroleum Exploration and Development
China · KeAi Communications Co.
workspace_premium Q1 — Energy Engineering and Power Technology visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access Unclaimed

Petroleum Exploration and Development

Petroleum Exploration and Development is a journal indexed in SJR in Energy Engineering and Power Technology and Geology with an H index of 88. It is an CC BY-NC-ND Journal with a Double blind peer review review system The scope of the journal is focused on petroleum sciences, geophysics, geochemistry, exploration and development of oil and gas fields, reservoir engineering, oil storage and transportation. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,661 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in Chinese, English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,661.

Editorial: KeAi Communications Co.
Category: Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guía para Autores (Guidelines)
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,661 Q1
H-index 88
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
29% Selectiva
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
15 semanas
Campo Average_time_publication_weeks
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Ruta Non-OA NPD

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR

SJR Impact

1,661

H-index

88

Docs (year)

118

Docs 3y

357

Total refs

4942

Cites 3y

3092

Citable 3y

357

Cites/Doc 2y

7.71

Ref/Doc

41.88

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQS