Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,777 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
RSC Advances
United Kingdom · Royal Society of Chemistry
workspace_premium Q1 — Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous) visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

RSC Advances

RSC Advances is a journal indexed in SJR in Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous) and Chemistry (miscellaneous) with an H index of 230. It is an CC BY-NC Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 1829 €. The scope of the journal is focused on chemistry, chemical sciences. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,777 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,777.

RSC Advances focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: carbon, nanoparticles, activity, application, acid, effect, iron, synthesis, oxide, enhanced, ...

Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
Category: Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,777 Q1
H-index 230
Acceptance rate pie_chart
21% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
8 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
1.829 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,777

H-index

230

Docs (year)

3304

Docs 3y

10391

Total refs

194819

Cites 3y

49044

Citable 3y

10377

Cites/Doc 2y

4.73

Ref/Doc

58.96

Immediate OA

1829 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs