Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,179 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & DOAJ indexed
Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica
Romania · Editura Universitatii Al. I....
workspace_premium Q1 — Archeology (arts and humanities) verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica

Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica is a journal indexed in SJR in Archeology (arts and humanities) and Archeology with an H index of 7. It is an CC BY Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system The scope of the journal is focused on antiquity, classics, prehistory, archaeology of Eastern Europe, archaeology of East-Central Europe, archaeology of the Balkans. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,179 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English, French, German, Italian, Romanian; Moldavian; Moldovan. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,179.

ISSN: 1224-2284
Publisher: Editura Universitatii Al. I. Cuza Iasi
Category: Archeology (arts and humanities)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,179 Q1
H-index 7
Acceptance rate pie_chart
63%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
20 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,179

H-index

7

Docs (year)

26

Docs 3y

85

Total refs

1612

Cites 3y

13

Citable 3y

82

Cites/Doc 2y

0.07

Ref/Doc

62.0

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs