Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,133 · Q2 • database Scopus / SJR & DOAJ & Latindex indexed
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
Poland · Adam Mickiewicz University
workspace_premium Q2 — Language and Linguistics visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Studia Romanica Posnaniensia

Studia Romanica Posnaniensia is a journal indexed in SJR in Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language with an H index of 5. It is an CC BY-NC-SA Journal with a Double blind peer review review system The scope of the journal is focused on Romance linguistics, history of Romance languages, foreign language acquisition, translation studies, literary studies. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,133 and it has a best quartile of Q2. It is published in Catalan; Valencian, French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian; Moldavian; Moldovan, Spanish; Castilian. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,133.

ISSN: 0137-2475
Publisher: Adam Mickiewicz University
Category: Language and Linguistics
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedDOAJ verifiedLatindex
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,133 Q2
H-index 5
Acceptance rate pie_chart
74%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
24 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR DOAJ Latindex

SJR Impact

0,133

H-index

5

Docs (year)

51

Docs 3y

114

Total refs

1430

Cites 3y

10

Citable 3y

111

Cites/Doc 2y

0.13

Ref/Doc

28.04

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs