Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,313 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Germany · Copernicus Publications
workspace_premium Q1 — Atmospheric Science verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques is a journal indexed in SJR in Atmospheric Science with an H index of 122. It is an CC BY Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 1000 €. The scope of the journal is focused on remote sensing, measurement instruments and techniques, data processing, information retrieval, gases, aerosols. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,313 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,313.

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: cloud, calibration, photometric, standard, microwave, retrieval, aerosol, field, moon, observation, ...

ISSN: 1867-1381
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Category: Atmospheric Science
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,313 Q1
H-index 122
Acceptance rate pie_chart
25% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
14 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
1.000 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

1,313

H-index

122

Docs (year)

360

Docs 3y

1122

Total refs

20495

Cites 3y

4177

Citable 3y

1122

Cites/Doc 2y

3.43

Ref/Doc

56.93

Immediate OA

1000 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs