Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,117 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Clinical interventions in aging
New Zealand · Dove Medical Press Ltd.
workspace_premium Q1 — Medicine (miscellaneous) visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Clinical interventions in aging

Clinical interventions in aging is a journal indexed in SJR in Medicine (miscellaneous) and Geriatrics and Gerontology with an H index of 114. It is an CC BY-NC Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 2079 €. The scope of the journal is focused on aging, metabolic therapies, senescence, diseases of aging, anti-aging. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,117 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,117.

Clinical interventions in aging focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: older, adults, hospital, exercise, elderly, population, study, aging, life, risk, ...

ISSN: 1176-9092
Publisher: Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Category: Medicine (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,117 Q1
H-index 114
Acceptance rate pie_chart
26% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
16 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
2.079 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

1,117

H-index

114

Docs (year)

203

Docs 3y

531

Total refs

8066

Cites 3y

2138

Citable 3y

513

Cites/Doc 2y

3.68

Ref/Doc

39.73

Immediate OA

2079 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs