Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 3,005 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
European Respiratory Review
Switzerland · European Respiratory Society
workspace_premium Q1 — Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

European Respiratory Review

European Respiratory Review is a journal indexed in SJR in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine with an H index of 103. It is an CC BY-NC Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system The scope of the journal is focused on respiratory medicine, science and surgery. It has an SJR impact factor of 3,005 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 3,005.

European Respiratory Review focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: lung, rare, hypertension, pesticide, syndrome, exposure, diseases, arterial, factors, airways, ...

ISSN: 0905-9180
Publisher: European Respiratory Society
Category: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
3,005 Q1
H-index 103
Acceptance rate pie_chart
27% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
24 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

3,005

H-index

103

Docs (year)

115

Docs 3y

314

Total refs

11814

Cites 3y

3113

Citable 3y

295

Cites/Doc 2y

10

Ref/Doc

102.73

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs