Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,371 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Health Expectations
United Kingdom · Wiley-Blackwell Publishing L...
workspace_premium Q1 — Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Health Expectations

Health Expectations is a journal indexed in SJR in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health with an H index of 100. It is an CC BY Journal with a Double blind peer review review system, and It has a price of 2187 €. The scope of the journal is focused on patient-centered care, health care policy, health services, patient care, quality improvement. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,371 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,371.

Health Expectations focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: primary, care, healthcare, health, patient, experiences, qualitative, study, informants, approach, ...

ISSN: 1369-6513
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Category: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,371 Q1
H-index 100
Acceptance rate pie_chart
26% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
13 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
2.187 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

1,371

H-index

100

Docs (year)

427

Docs 3y

701

Total refs

20359

Cites 3y

2904

Citable 3y

688

Cites/Doc 2y

3.7

Ref/Doc

47.68

Immediate OA

2187 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs