Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,318 · Q3 • database Scopus / SJR & DOAJ indexed
Journal of Electronic Publishing
United States · University of Michigan Press
workspace_premium Q3 — Information Systems visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Journal of Electronic Publishing

Journal of Electronic Publishing is a journal indexed in SJR in Information Systems with an H index of 19. It is an CC BY-NC-ND Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system The scope of the journal is focused on library and information science, publishing, digital publishing. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,318 and it has a best quartile of Q3. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,318.

Journal of Electronic Publishing focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: publishing, journal, scholarly, studieswhat, experiences, responsibility, organizational, universitythe, international, universities, ...

Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Category: Information Systems
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,318 Q3
H-index 19
Acceptance rate pie_chart
42%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
16 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,318

H-index

19

Docs (year)

22

Docs 3y

27

Total refs

937

Cites 3y

27

Citable 3y

24

Cites/Doc 2y

1.08

Ref/Doc

42.59

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs