Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,457 · Q3 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
United States · John Wiley & Sons Inc.
workspace_premium Q3 — Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences

Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences is a journal indexed in SJR in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology with an H index of 33. It is an CC BY-NC-ND Journal with a Double blind peer review review system, and It has a price of 1404 €. The scope of the journal is focused on radiation sciences, radiography, radiology, imaging, sonography. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,457 and it has a best quartile of Q3. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,457.

ISSN: 2051-3895
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Category: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,457 Q3
H-index 33
Acceptance rate pie_chart
40%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
8 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
1.404 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,457

H-index

33

Docs (year)

121

Docs 3y

230

Total refs

3588

Cites 3y

439

Citable 3y

184

Cites/Doc 2y

1.5

Ref/Doc

29.65

Immediate OA

1404 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs