Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 2,835 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
npj Computational Materials
United Kingdom · Nature Publishing Group
workspace_premium Q1 — Materials Science (miscellaneous) verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ Unclaimed

npj Computational Materials

npj Computational Materials is a journal indexed in SJR in Materials Science (miscellaneous) and Modeling and Simulation with an H index of 97. It is an CC BY Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 2490 €. The scope of the journal is focused on materials by design, data mining, materials data generation, computational studies, materials discovery. It has an SJR impact factor of 2,835 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 2,835.

Editorial: Nature Publishing Group
Category: Materials Science (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guía para Autores (Guidelines)
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
2,835 Q1
H-index 97
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
31%
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
6 semanas
Campo Average_time_publication_weeks
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
2.490 € Open Access
Ruta Non-OA NPD

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

2,835

H-index

97

Docs (year)

294

Docs 3y

681

Total refs

19905

Cites 3y

7877

Citable 3y

676

Cites/Doc 2y

11.24

Ref/Doc

67.7

Immediate OA

2490 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQS