CountryOfPapers CountryOfPapers
Journal list Promote
verified COP 0,8 · Q4 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
Russian Federation · Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kom...
workspace_premium Q4 — Pharmacology (medical) verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access

Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology

Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology is a journal indexed in SJR in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pharmacology (medical) with an H index of 15. It is an CC BY Journal with a Double blind peer review review system The scope of the journal is focused on cardiology, diagnosis and treatment of heart disease, clinical pharmacology, pharmacotherapy, randomized clinical trials, cardiovascular risk factor. It has a COP Index of 0,8 (best band Q4). It is published in English, Russian. It has a COP Index of 0,8.

ISSN: 1819-6446
Publisher: Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya
Category: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
COP Index trending_up
0,8 Q4

171 of 216 journals in Pharmacology (medical)

H-index · SJR 15 · 0,185
Acceptance rate pie_chart
51%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
6 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

COP Index

0,8

Q4

SJR Impact

0,185

H-index

15

Docs (year)

72

Docs 3y

304

Total refs

2391

Cites 3y

223

Citable 3y

304

Cites/Doc 2y

0.78

Ref/Doc

33.21

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs