Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,185 · Q4 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
Russian Federation · Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kom...
workspace_premium Q4 — Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Double blind peer review lock_open Open Access Unclaimed

Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology

Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology is a journal indexed in SJR in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pharmacology (medical) with an H index of 15. It is an CC BY Journal with a Double blind peer review review system The scope of the journal is focused on cardiology, diagnosis and treatment of heart disease, clinical pharmacology, pharmacotherapy, randomized clinical trials, cardiovascular risk factor. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,185 and it has a best quartile of Q4. It is published in English, Russian. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,185.

ISSN: 1819-6446
Editorial: Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya
Category: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guía para Autores (Guidelines)
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,185 Q4
H-index 15
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
51%
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
6 semanas
Campo Average_time_publication_weeks
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Ruta Non-OA NPD

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

0,185

H-index

15

Docs (year)

72

Docs 3y

304

Total refs

2391

Cites 3y

223

Citable 3y

304

Cites/Doc 2y

0.78

Ref/Doc

33.21

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQS