ISSN: 2329-4515

Journal Home

Journal Guideline

AJOB Empirical Bioethics Q1 Unclaimed

Taylor and Francis Ltd. United Kingdom

Unfortunately this journal has not been claimed yet. For this reason, some information may be unavailable.

AJOB Empirical Bioethics is a journal indexed in SJR in Health (social science) and Health Policy with an H index of 28. It has a price of 2395 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,643 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,643.

Type: Journal

Type of Copyright:

Languages:

Open Access Policy:

Type of publications:

Publication frecuency: -

Categories: Philosophy (Q1) Health Policy (Q2) Health (social science) (Q2)

Price

2395 €

Inmediate OA

NPD

Embargoed OA

0 €

Non OA

Metrics

0,643

SJR Impact factor

28

H Index

34

Total Docs (Last Year)

66

Total Docs (3 years)

1569

Total Refs

141

Total Cites (3 years)

65

Citable Docs (3 years)

2.19

Cites/Doc (2 years)

46.15

Ref/Doc

Comments

No comments ... Be the first to comment!

Publication speed *

Review quality *

Edition and editorial team *

Institutional email or ORCID *

* The email or ORCID field is only to validate the authenticity of the comment, the identity will not be public. .

Other journals with similar parameters

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report Q1
The Lancet Planetary Health Q1
MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control Q1
Qualitiative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health Q1
Trauma, Violence and Abuse Q1

Compare this journals

Aims and Scope

Best articles by citations

Reliance agreements and single IRB review of multisite research: Concerns of IRB members and staff

Noninvasive Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy: A Hong Kong Perspective

Hoping Someday Never Comes: Deferring Ethical Thinking About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

Trust and Expectations of Researchers and Public Health Departments for the Use of HIV Molecular Epidemiology

Old Questions, New Paradigms: Ethical, Legal, and Social Complications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

"Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in the United States

Return of Value in the New Era of Biomedical Research - One Size Will Not Fit All

Knowledge of Federal Regulations for Mental Health Research Involving Prisoners

Demonstrating Patterns in the Views of Stakeholders Regarding Ethically Salient Issues in Clinical Research: A Novel Use of Graphical Models in Empirical Ethics Inquiry

Adolescent research participants' descriptions of medical research

Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation

Decision making in pediatric oncology: Views of parents and physicians in two European countries

SHOW MORE ARTICLES

To report or not to report: Exploring healthy volunteers' rationales for disclosing adverse events in Phase I drug trials

Knowledge of Pediatric Ethics: Results of a Survey of Pediatric Ethics Consultants

Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey

Religious identity and workplace discrimination: A national survey of American Muslim physicians

Single-Patient Expanded Access Requests: IRB Professionals' Experiences and Perspectives

Framing the diagnosis and treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility: Insights from in-depth interviews with uterus transplant trial participants

A Content Analysis of Patient Advocacy Organization Policies Addressing Institutional Conflicts of Interest

From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing

How should we deal with misattributed paternity? A survey of lay public attitudes

A content analysis of the views of genetics professionals on race, ancestry, and genetics

Utilizing Focus Groups with Potential Participants and Their Parents: An Approach to Inform Study Design in a Large Clinical Trial

Bad moms, blameless dads: The portrayal of maternal and paternal age and preconception harm in U.S. newspapers