Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,786 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
United Kingdom · John Wiley and Sons Inc
workspace_premium Q1 — Obstetrics and Gynecology lock_open Open Access Unclaimed

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology is a journal indexed in SJR in Obstetrics and Gynecology with an H index of 195. It has a price of 2500 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,786 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,786.

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: women, study, systematic, maternal, outcomes, cohort, pregnancy, pelvic, health, controlled, ...

ISSN: 1470-0328
Editorial: John Wiley and Sons Inc
Category: Obstetrics and Gynecology
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guidelines NPD
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,786 Q1
H-index 195
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
21% Selectiva
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
NPD
Campo Sin dato
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
2.500 € Open Access
Ruta Non-OA 0 €

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

1,786

H-index

195

Docs (year)

336

Docs 3y

1119

Total refs

10098

Cites 3y

3145

Citable 3y

621

Cites/Doc 2y

2.81

Ref/Doc

30.05

Immediate OA

2500 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

0 €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Author's Reply

View more

Women's perceptions of decision-making about hysterectomy

View more

Editor's Choice

View more

Editor's Choice

View more

Editor's Choice

View more

Editor's Choice

View more

Defective haemochorial placentation as a cause of miscarriage; a preliminary study

View more

Changes in vaginal flora after 2% clindamycin vaginal cream in women at high risk of preterm birth

View more

Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study

View more

Can pre-operative computed tomography predict resectability of ovarian carcinoma at primary laparotomy?

View more

BJOG trainee editors

View more

Author's reply re: Postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may cause more harm than benefit: a critical analysis of international guidelines through an evidence-based lens

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Author's Reply

View more

A case of failed fibroid embolisation due to an unusual vascular supply

View more

Author's reply

View more

Are reported preterm birth rates reliable? An analysis of interhospital differences in the calculation of the weeks of gestation at delivery and preterm birth rate

View more

Antepartum to postpartum changes in transcapillary fluid balance

View more

An unusual gestational choriocarcinoma occurring primarily on the surface of a subserous leiomyoma

View more

An intergenerational study of birthweight: investigating the birth order effect

View more

Adrenal artery rupture in pregnancy

View more

Accuracy of outpatient biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review

View more

A rapidly growing uterine fibroid postpartum

View more

A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term

View more

A prospective randomised trial of atosiban versus hexoprenaline for acute tocolysis and intrauterine resuscitation

View more

FAQS