Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,686 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed
Cognition
Netherlands · Elsevier B.V.
workspace_premium Q1 — Cognitive Neuroscience lock Subscription Unclaimed

Cognition

Cognition is a journal indexed in SJR in Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology with an H index of 235. It has a price of 2040 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,686 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,686.

Cognition focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: language, linked, intuitions, physical, experts, essential, ownership, multimodal, effects, adult, ...

ISSN: 0010-0277
Editorial: Elsevier B.V.
Category: Cognitive Neuroscience
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guidelines NPD
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,686 Q1
H-index 235
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
20% Selectiva
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
NPD
Campo Sin dato
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
2.040 € Subscription
Ruta Non-OA 0 €

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

1,686

H-index

235

Docs (year)

218

Docs 3y

877

Total refs

15469

Cites 3y

3156

Citable 3y

863

Cites/Doc 2y

3.21

Ref/Doc

70.96

Immediate OA

2040 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

0 €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Syntax or semantics? Response to Lidz et al.

View more

Young infants' reasoning about hidden objects: evidence from violation-of-expectation tasks with test trials only

View more

Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it

View more

Why we are so good at catching cheaters

View more

When is a computer not a computer?

View more

What makes a face photo a 'good likeness'?

View more

Utility and deontic reasoning: Some comments on Johnson-Laird and Byrne

View more

Wisdom and aging: irrational preferences in college students but not older adults

View more

The ontogeny of face identity I. Eight- to 21-week-old infants use internal and external face features in identity

View more

The infant's theory of self-propelled objects

View more

The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects

View more

The effect of oral vocabulary on reading visually novel words: a comparison of the dual-route-cascaded and triangle frameworks

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization

View more

Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production -an online study

View more

Synchronous change and perception of object unity: evidence from adults and infants

View more

Superior modulation of activation levels of stimulus representations does not underlie superior discrimination in autism

View more

Spatial categories and the estimation of location

View more

Soar and the case for unified theories of cognition

View more

Sins of omission are more likely to be forgiven in non-native speakers

View more

Reply to Beaman

View more

Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: a reply to the replies

View more

Reading Chinese characters for meaning: the role of phonological information

View more

Race models and analogy theories: A dead heat? Reply to Seidenberg

View more

Psychology and epistemology: The place versus response controversy

View more

FAQS