ISSN: 1744-2648
Journal Home
Journal Guideline
Evidence and Policy Q1 Unclaimed
Evidence and Policy is a journal indexed in SJR in Physiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine with an H index of 43. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,665 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,665.
Type: Journal
Type of Copyright:
Languages:
Open Access Policy:
Type of publications:
Publication frecuency: -


- €
Inmediate OANPD
Embargoed OA- €
Non OAMetrics
0,665
SJR Impact factor43
H Index36
Total Docs (Last Year)130
Total Docs (3 years)1444
Total Refs267
Total Cites (3 years)126
Citable Docs (3 years)1.77
Cites/Doc (2 years)40.11
Ref/DocOther journals with similar parameters
Circulation Q1
Annual Review of Plant Biology Q1
Nature Metabolism Q1
Annual Review of Physiology Q1
Circulation Research Q1
Compare this journals
Aims and Scope
Best articles by citations
Editorial
View moreSystematic reviews in social policy: to go forward, do we first need to look back?
View moreLocally based research and development units as knowledge brokers and change facilitators in health and social care of older people in Sweden
View morePromoting the use of diverse sources of evidence: evaluating progress in the provision of services for people with dementia and their carers
View moreReconstructing and assessing the evaluation logic of the dutch Closed Criminal Cases Evaluation Commission: report of a meta-evaluation
View moreThe usefulness of different types of health research: perspectives from a low-income country
View moreApplying policy and evidence in developing cultural diversity teaching in undergraduate medical education in the UK
View moreJust in time: how evidence-on-demand services support decision making in Ontario's child and youth mental health sector
View moreEditorial
View moreThe Social Care Institute for Excellence: reaching a crossroads
View moreEmotional engagement in strategic partnerships: grassroots organising in a tobacco control partnership in the North East of England
View moreCredibility and credibility work in knowledge transfer
View moreWhat do practitioners want from research, what do funders fund and what needs to be done to know more about what works in the new world of children's services?
View moreTheorising the evidence on discretionary decision making: alternative perspectives
View moreScotland's national learning networks: coordinators' reflections
View moreAffecting policy and practice: issues involved in developing an Argument Catalogue
View moreMinding the gap: the barriers and facilitators of getting evidence into policy when using a knowledge-brokering approach
View moreThe nation's data? The UK census -guaranteed confidentiality but only limited information
View more'Research into Practice': a model for healthcare management research?
View moreBad evidence: the curious case of the government-commissioned review of elective home education in England and how parents exposed its weaknesses
View moreSocial care research: a suitable case for systematic review?
View moreReflections of 'knowledge exchange professionals' in the social sciences: emerging opportunities and challenges for university-based knowledge brokers
View moreEditorial
View moreBridge over a philosophical divide
View more
Comments