Default: Evidence and Policy

ISSN: 1744-2648

Journal Home

Journal Guideline

Evidence and Policy Q1 Unclaimed

Policy Press United Kingdom
Unfortunately this journal has not been claimed yet. For this reason, some information may be unavailable.

Evidence and Policy is a journal indexed in SJR in Physiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine with an H index of 43. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,665 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,665.

Type: Journal

Type of Copyright:

Languages:

Open Access Policy:

Type of publications:

Publication frecuency: -

Metrics

Evidence and Policy

0,665

SJR Impact factor

43

H Index

36

Total Docs (Last Year)

130

Total Docs (3 years)

1444

Total Refs

267

Total Cites (3 years)

126

Citable Docs (3 years)

1.77

Cites/Doc (2 years)

40.11

Ref/Doc

Comments

No comments ... Be the first to comment!

Aims and Scope





Best articles by citations

Editorial

View more

Systematic reviews in social policy: to go forward, do we first need to look back?

View more

Locally based research and development units as knowledge brokers and change facilitators in health and social care of older people in Sweden

View more

Promoting the use of diverse sources of evidence: evaluating progress in the provision of services for people with dementia and their carers

View more

Reconstructing and assessing the evaluation logic of the dutch Closed Criminal Cases Evaluation Commission: report of a meta-evaluation

View more

The usefulness of different types of health research: perspectives from a low-income country

View more

Applying policy and evidence in developing cultural diversity teaching in undergraduate medical education in the UK

View more

Just in time: how evidence-on-demand services support decision making in Ontario's child and youth mental health sector

View more

Editorial

View more

The Social Care Institute for Excellence: reaching a crossroads

View more

Emotional engagement in strategic partnerships: grassroots organising in a tobacco control partnership in the North East of England

View more

Credibility and credibility work in knowledge transfer

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

What do practitioners want from research, what do funders fund and what needs to be done to know more about what works in the new world of children's services?

View more

Theorising the evidence on discretionary decision making: alternative perspectives

View more

Scotland's national learning networks: coordinators' reflections

View more

Affecting policy and practice: issues involved in developing an Argument Catalogue

View more

Minding the gap: the barriers and facilitators of getting evidence into policy when using a knowledge-brokering approach

View more

The nation's data? The UK census -guaranteed confidentiality but only limited information

View more

'Research into Practice': a model for healthcare management research?

View more

Bad evidence: the curious case of the government-commissioned review of elective home education in England and how parents exposed its weaknesses

View more

Social care research: a suitable case for systematic review?

View more

Reflections of 'knowledge exchange professionals' in the social sciences: emerging opportunities and challenges for university-based knowledge brokers

View more

Editorial

View more

Bridge over a philosophical divide

View more

FAQS