Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,176 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
United Kingdom · Cambridge University Press
workspace_premium Q1 — Social Psychology lock_open Open Access

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Industrial and Organizational Psychology is a journal indexed in SJR in Social Psychology and Applied Psychology with an H index of 53. It has a price of 1503,13 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,176 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,176.

ISSN: 1754-9426
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Category: Social Psychology
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science
open_in_new Visit publisher site menu_book Guidelines NPD
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,176 Q1
H-index 53
Acceptance rate pie_chart
62%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
NPD
Field NPD
Publication cost (APC) payments
1.503 € Open Access
Non-OA path 0 €

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

1,176

H-index

53

Docs (year)

73

Docs 3y

307

Total refs

2138

Cites 3y

437

Citable 3y

70

Cites/Doc 2y

1.04

Ref/Doc

29.29

Immediate OA

1503,13 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

0 €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Coherent Conceptualization Is Useful for Many Things, and Understanding Validity Is One of Them

View more

What Practice Needs From Science Regarding Innovation Management

View more

Early Identification of Future Executives: A Functional Approach

View more

Do We Really Need New Constructs? An Argument for Adapting Individual Predictors to Dynamic Environments

View more

Do Theory and Techniques in Executive Coaching Matter More Than in Therapy?

View more

Do Second-Generation Models Have More to Offer?

View more

Disclosure or Nondisclosure - Is This the Question?

View more

Difference in Response Effort Across Sample Types: Perception or Reality?

View more

Content Validity Does Matter for the Criterion-Related Validity of Personality Tests

View more

Content Validity and Murphy's Angst

View more

Content Validation Is Useful for Many Things, but Validity Isn't One of Them

View more

Content Validation Is Fundamental for Optimizing the Criterion Validity of Personality Tests

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Complex and Collaborative Problem Solving: New, Unique, and Useful?

View more

"Content" Still Belongs With "Validity"

View more

Clarifying the Concept and Context of Content Validation

View more

Challenging Some Basic Assumptions About Psychology and Executive Coaching: Who Knows Best, Who Is the Client, and What Are the Goals of Executive Coaching?

View more

Bridging Science and Practice: Toward a Standard, Evidence-Based Framework of 21st Century Skills

View more

Balancing Development With Day-to-Day Task Demands: A Multiple-Goal Approach to Executive Coaching

View more

Babies, Bathwater, and Validity: Content Validity Is Useful in the Validation Process

View more

Assessing 21st Century Skills: Competency Modeling to the Rescue

View more

A Dynamic Approach to Managing Contradictions

View more

A Dialectic Perspective on Problem Identification and Construction

View more

A Cooperative Advantage: An Alternative Informed by Institutional Theory

View more

"The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions..."

View more

FAQs