ISSN: 2042-6305

Journal Home

Journal Guideline

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research Q2 Unclaimed

United Kingdom

Unfortunately this journal has not been claimed yet. For this reason, some information may be unavailable.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research is a journal indexed in SJR in Health Policy with an H index of 39. It has a price of 2100 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,708 and it has a best quartile of Q2. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,708.

Type: Journal

Type of Copyright:

Languages:

Open Access Policy:

Type of publications:

Publication frecuency: -

Categories: Health Policy (Q2)

Price

2100 €

Inmediate OA

NPD

Embargoed OA

0 €

Non OA

Metrics

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

0,708

SJR Impact factor

39

H Index

95

Total Docs (Last Year)

359

Total Docs (3 years)

2502

Total Refs

731

Total Cites (3 years)

331

Citable Docs (3 years)

2.17

Cites/Doc (2 years)

26.34

Ref/Doc

Comments

No comments ... Be the first to comment!

Publication speed *

Review quality *

Edition and editorial team *

Institutional email or ORCID *

* The email or ORCID field is only to validate the authenticity of the comment, the identity will not be public. .

Other journals with similar parameters

Digital Health Q2
Chronic Illness Q2
International Journal for Quality in Health Care Q2
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Q2
Journal of Medical Screening Q2

Compare this journals

Aims and Scope

Best articles by citations

Cost-effectiveness thresholds in the USA: are they coming? Are they already here?

A comparison of outcomes for early oropharyngeal cancers treated with single-modality surgery versus radiotherapy

Introducing Volume 8 of the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Comparison of conservative treatment with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis: a meta-analysis

Willingness to pay for medical treatments in chronic diseases: a multicountry survey of patients and physicians

Comparative outcome of induced labor by intracervical Foley catheter with misoprostol versus misoprostol alone

Comparing twice- versus four-times daily insulin in mothers with gestational diabetes in Pakistan and its implications

Analysis of the influence of recent reforms in China: cardiovascular and cerebrovascular medicines as a case history to provide future direction

Tying comparative effectiveness information to decision-making and the future of comparative effectiveness research designs: the case for antipsychotic drugs

Comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research: enhancing uptake and use by patients, clinicians and payers

Comparative effectiveness of adalimumab and etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis in the Brazilian Public Health System

Using comparative effectiveness research to remedy health disparities

SHOW MORE ARTICLES

RiGOR: a prospective observational study comparing the effectiveness of treatment strategies for open-angle glaucoma

Comparative effectiveness of different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the risk of hospitalization in patients with heart failure

Improved clinical, functional and work outcomes in spondyloarthritides during real-life adalimumab treatment in central-eastern Europe

Comparative effectiveness of efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimens in resource-limited settings

Why are patients uncertain about the human papillomavirus vaccine's effectiveness?

Comparative effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in hypertension

Continuous infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in Parkinson's disease

Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research

Comparative effectiveness of surgery versus antibiotics in acute appendicitis: a systematic review

Reporting and analyses of sex/gender and race/ethnicity in randomized controlled trials of interventions published in the highest-ranking anesthesiology journals

Statin prescribing among hypertensive patients in southwest Nigeria: findings and implications for the future

Comparative effectiveness of transurethral resection of bladder tumors and office fulguration for recurrent bladder tumors