Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,894 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed
Land Use Policy
United Kingdom · Elsevier Ltd
workspace_premium Q1 — Forestry lock Subscription Unclaimed

Land Use Policy

Land Use Policy is a journal indexed in SJR in Forestry and Nature and Landscape Conservation with an H index of 171. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,894 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,894.

Land Use Policy focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: land, change, agricultural, cover, landscape, governance, management, private, organic, method, ...

ISSN: 0264-8377
Editorial: Elsevier Ltd
Category: Forestry
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guidelines NPD
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,894 Q1
H-index 171
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
23% Selectiva
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
NPD
Campo Sin dato
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
NPD Subscription
Ruta Non-OA NPD

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

1,894

H-index

171

Docs (year)

330

Docs 3y

1655

Total refs

24836

Cites 3y

12877

Citable 3y

1648

Cites/Doc 2y

6.99

Ref/Doc

75.26

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

—

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Cross-fertilization of ideas on land tenure and administration

View more

Workshop on land use

View more

How to visualise the invisible: Revealing re-use of rural buildings by non-agricultural entrepreneurs in the region of Roeselare-Tielt (Belgium)

View more

Future nature: A vision for conservation

View more

Exploring the socioeconomic and ecological consequences of cash crop cultivation for policy implications

View more

Environmental benchmarks for agriculture? Clarifying the framework in a federal system - Australia

View more

Ecoregion-based conservation in the Carpathians and the land-use implications

View more

Economic benefit and ecological cost of enlarging tea cultivation in subtropical China: Characterizing the trade-off for policy implications

View more

Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: comparing the conventional approach to an 'actual land area' approach

View more

Developing spatial data infrastructures: from concept to reality

View more

Demand-side management in the electricity sector

View more

Decolonizing nature - strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Decentralization and biodiversity conservation: A World Bank symposium

View more

"Retraction notice to ""Double cropping in paddy fields of northern Iran: Current trends and determinants of adoption"" [Land Use Policy 62 (2017) 59-67]"

View more

Conserved to death

View more

Concerted approach to land-use management: developing common working procedures. A Cevennes case study (France)

View more

Brazil's Rural Land Tax

View more

Biomass energy in Western Europe to 2050

View more

Analyzing the drivers of tree planting in Yunnan, China, with Bayesian networks

View more

An exploratory analysis on waste management in Italy: A focus on waste disposed in landfill

View more

Agricultural Transformation, Food and Environment: Perspectives on European rural policy and planning - Vol. 1

View more

Agri-environmental indicators: issues and choices

View more

Actual land demand of Austria 1926-2000: a variation on Ecological Footprint assessments

View more

A cross-national comparison of harmful housing design

View more

FAQS