ISSN: 1874-5490

Journal Guideline

Neuroethics Q1 Unclaimed

Springer Netherlands Netherlands

Unfortunately this journal has not been claimed yet. For this reason, some information may be unavailable.

Neuroethics is a forum for interdisciplinary studies in neuroethics and related issues in the sciences of the mind. The focus is on ethical issues posed by new technologies developed via neuroscience, such as psycho-pharmaceuticals and other ways of intervening in the mind; the practice of neuroscience itself, including problems posed by incidental findings in imaging work on research subjects; regulation of neuroscientific technologies, and ways in which the sciences of the mind illuminate traditional moral and philosophical problems, such as the nature of free will and moral responsibility, self-deception, weakness of the will and the nature of personhood. This important publication covers the dual areas of neuroethics: the ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics. It offers comprehensive bibliographies, reviews of significant literature, information on activities including partial proceedings of selected meetings, and an opinions section for reader commentaries. Discusses ethical issues posed by new technologies developed via neuroscienceExplores problems posed by incidental findings in imaging work on research subjectsExplores the ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics100% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again It has an SJR impact factor of 0,419.

Type: Journal

Type of Copyright:

Languages: English

Open Access Policy: Open Choice

Type of publications:

Publication frecuency: -

Categories: Philosophy (Q1) Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects (Q2) Health Policy (Q3) Neurology (Q3) Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q3)

Price

2290 €

Inmediate OA

NPD

Embargoed OA

0 €

Non OA

Metrics

0,419

SJR Impact factor

39

H Index

27

Total Docs (Last Year)

126

Total Docs (3 years)

1546

Total Refs

355

Total Cites (3 years)

125

Citable Docs (3 years)

2.76

Cites/Doc (2 years)

57.26

Ref/Doc

Comments

No comments ... Be the first to comment!

Publication speed *

Review quality *

Edition and editorial team *

Institutional email or ORCID *

* The email or ORCID field is only to validate the authenticity of the comment, the identity will not be public. .

Other journals with similar parameters

The Lancet Psychiatry Q1
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Q1
JAMA Psychiatry Q1
Clinical Psychology Review Q1
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics Q1

Compare this journals

Aims and Scope

Best articles by citations

Personal Identity, Direction of Change, and Neuroethics

Treatments and Services for Neurodevelopmental Disorders on Advocacy Websites: Information or Evaluation?

The Locked-in Syndrome: Perspectives from Ethics, History, and Phenomenology

Introduction: Reconsidering Disorders of Consciousness in Light of Neuroscientific Evidence

Brain Machine Interface and Human Enhancement -An Ethical Review

Unpacking Neuroscience and Neurotechnology - Instructions not Included: Neuroethics Required.

Why Neurotechnologies? About the Purposes, Opportunities and Limitations of Neurotechnologies in Clinical Applications

Review of Daniel Kelly: Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust

Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity

A Defense of Brain Death

The BCN Challenge to Compatibilist Free Will and Personal Responsibility

Saving the World through Sacrificing Liberties? A Critique of some Normative Arguments in Unfit for the Future

SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Knowledge of Partial Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness: Implications for Ethical Evaluations?

Incapacitation, Reintegration, and Limited General Deterrence

Moral Responsibility and the Psychopath

Can Science Determine Moral Values? A Reply to Sam Harris

Locked-in Syndrome and BCI - Towards an Enactive Approach to the Self

Acceptance in Theory but not Practice -Chinese Medical Providers' Perception of Brain Death

Introduction

Amnestic MCI Patients' Perspectives toward Disclosure of Amyloid PET Results in a Research Context

Cognitive Enhancement and the Principle of Need

The Irrelevance of a Moral Right to Privacy for Biomedical Moral Enhancement

Metamorality without Moral Truth

Knowledge, Experiences and Views of German University Students Toward Neuroenhancement: An Empirical-Ethical Analysis