Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,322 · Q3 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
United Kingdom · John Wiley and Sons Ltd
workspace_premium Q3 — Nuclear Energy and Engineering verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ Unclaimed

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations is a journal indexed in SJR in Nuclear Energy and Engineering with an H index of 32. It is an CC BY Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 1170 €. The scope of the journal is focused on nuclear installations, nuclear reactors, nuclear industry. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,322 and it has a best quartile of Q3. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,322.

ISSN: 1687-6075
Editorial: John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Category: Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guía para Autores (Guidelines)
schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,322 Q3
H-index 32
Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart
37%
Fuente Acceptance_Rate
Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top
22 semanas
Campo Average_time_publication_weeks
Coste de Publicación (APC) payments
1.170 € Open Access
Ruta Non-OA NPD

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,322

H-index

32

Docs (year)

17

Docs 3y

137

Total refs

608

Cites 3y

167

Citable 3y

137

Cites/Doc 2y

1.07

Ref/Doc

35.76

Immediate OA

1170 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Assessment of LWR-HTR-GCFR Integrated Cycle

View more

Validation of Infinite Impulse Response Multilayer Perceptron for Modelling Nuclear Dynamics

View more

Delayed Station Blackout Event and Nuclear Safety

View more

Decay Heat Removal in GEN IV Gas-Cooled Fast Reactors

View more

Conceptual Engineering of CARA Fuel Element with Negative Void Coefficient for Atucha II

View more

Comparative Neutronics Analysis of DIMPLE S06 Criticality Benchmark with Contemporary Reactor Core Analysis Computer Code Systems

View more

CHF Enhancement of Advanced 37-Element Fuel Bundles

View more

CFD Simulation of Polydispersed Bubbly Two-Phase Flow around an Obstacle

View more

CFD Recombiner Modelling and Validation on the H2-Par and Kali-H2Experiments

View more

CFD Modeling of Wall Steam Condensation: Two-Phase Flow Approach versus Homogeneous Flow Approach

View more

CFD Analysis of the Passive Decay Heat Removal System of an LBE-Cooled Fast Reactor

View more

CFD Analysis of a Slug Mixing Experiment Conducted on a VVER-1000 Model

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Calculations for a BWR Lattice with Adjacent Gadolinium Pins Using the Monte Carlo Cell Code Serpent v.1.1.7

View more

A Second-Order Turbulence Model Based on a Reynolds Stress Approach for Two-Phase Flow - Part I: Adiabatic Cases

View more

Assessment of an Isolation Condenser of an Integral Reactor in View of Uncertainties in Engineering Parameters

View more

Application of REPAS Methodology to Assess the Reliability of Passive Safety Systems

View more

Analysis of Wetting Characteristics on Microstructured Hydrophobic Surfaces for the Passive Containment Cooling System

View more

Analysis of Steam Explosion under Conditions of Partially Flooded Cavity and Submerged Reactor Vessel

View more

Analysis of Loss of Essential Power System Reported in Nuclear Power Plants

View more

Analyses of the OSU-MASLWR Experimental Test Facility

View more

Analyses of Instability Events in the Peach Bottom-2 BWR Using Thermal-Hydraulic and 3D Neutron Kinetic Coupled Codes Technique

View more

An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model

View more

An Overview of the Pressurized Thermal Shock Issue in the Context of the NURESIM Project

View more

An Enhanced Preventive Maintenance Optimization Model Based on a Three-Stage Failure Process

View more

FAQS