Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,614 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Archaeological Dialogues
United Kingdom · Cambridge University Press
workspace_premium Q1 — Geography, Planning and Development lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Archaeological Dialogues

Archaeological Dialogues is a journal indexed in SJR in Geography, Planning and Development and Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) with an H index of 39. It has a price of 1626,56 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,614 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,614.

ISSN: 1380-2038
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Category: Geography, Planning and Development
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Visit publisher site menu_book Guidelines NPD
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,614 Q1
H-index 39
Acceptance rate pie_chart
34%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
NPD
Field NPD
Publication cost (APC) payments
1.627 € Open Access
Non-OA path 0 €

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

0,614

H-index

39

Docs (year)

4

Docs 3y

48

Total refs

143

Cites 3y

55

Citable 3y

29

Cites/Doc 2y

1.37

Ref/Doc

35.75

Immediate OA

1626,56 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

0 €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Archaeology, symmetry and the ontology of things. A response to critics

View more

Women in Roman forts -lack of knowledge or a social claim?

View more

Comparative slavery. A historian's view

View more

Comparative advantages. Roman slavery and imperialism

View more

Communities and the empire. The power of contextual analysis

View more

Comments on Adam T. Smith's 'The end of the essential archaeological subject'

View more

Colonizing currencies. Beasts, banknotes and the colour of money in South Africa Taking stock. A response to Turgeon and Creighton

View more

Colonial vindications. More on the history of South African prehistoric research

View more

Buried lives

View more

Assemblages, relationality and recursivity. Comments on 'Archaeology and contemporaneity' by Gavin Lucas

View more

Artefacts in quarantine?

View more

Artefacts between disciplines. The toothbrush and the axe

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Artefacts between disciplines. Response to responses

View more

A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic

View more

Archaeology, anthropology and the stuff of time

View more

Archaeology without -isms

View more

Archaeology is process

View more

Archaeology in the Third Reich. Academic scholarship and the rise of the 'lunatic fringe'

View more

Archaeology at the edge. An archaeological dialogue with Martin Hall

View more

Archaeology and identity politics. A cross-disciplinary perspective

View more

Archaeology and contemporaneousness

View more

Ambiguity and contradiction in the archaeology of slavery

View more

Agency (again). A response to Lindstr??m and Ribeiro

View more

Agency 'in itself'. A discussion of inanimate, animal and human agency

View more

FAQs