Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 1,238 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Database : the journal of biological databases and curation
United Kingdom · Oxford University Press
workspace_premium Q1 — Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) verified Plan S Compliant visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation is a journal indexed in SJR in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) with an H index of 88. It is an CC BY Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 880 €. The scope of the journal is focused on biological data, biocuration, ontology, databases. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,238 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,238.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: database, annotation, disease, semantic, antibody, opensource, binding, data, combination, association, ...

Publisher: Oxford University Press
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
1,238 Q1
H-index 88
Acceptance rate pie_chart
27% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
23 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
880 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

SJR Impact

1,238

H-index

88

Docs (year)

117

Docs 3y

303

Total refs

4837

Cites 3y

1150

Citable 3y

303

Cites/Doc 2y

3.09

Ref/Doc

41.34

Immediate OA

880 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs