CountryOfPapers CountryOfPapers
Journal list Promote
verified COP 3,3 · Q2 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science & DOAJ indexed
Optical Materials Express
United States · Optica Publishing Group (for...
workspace_premium Q2 — Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials visibility_off Single blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access · DOAJ

Optical Materials Express

Optical Materials Express is a journal indexed in SJR in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials with an H index of 90. It is an CC BY-NC Journal with a Single blind Peer Review review system, and It has a price of 2070 €. The scope of the journal is focused on optics, photonics, lasers, nanomaterials, metamaterials, optical materials. It has a COP Index of 3,3 (best band Q2). It is published in English. It has a COP Index of 3,3.

Optical Materials Express focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: silica, produced, distributed, operating, operation, perovskites, monocrystalline, nanostructured, nanoparticles, monodispersed, ...

Publisher: Optica Publishing Group (formerly OSA)
Category: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science verifiedDOAJ
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Author guidelines
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
COP Index trending_up
3,3 Q2

67 of 219 journals in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

H-index · SJR 90 · 0,69
Acceptance rate pie_chart
27% Selective
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
9 weeks
Field Average_time_publication_weeks
Publication cost (APC) payments
2.070 € Open Access
Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science DOAJ

COP Index

3,3

Q2

SJR Impact

0,69

H-index

90

Docs (year)

235

Docs 3y

1062

Total refs

9945

Cites 3y

3249

Citable 3y

1057

Cites/Doc 2y

3.21

Ref/Doc

42.32

Immediate OA

2070 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

- €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

FAQs