Journal list Promote Sponsor
verified SJR 0,472 · Q1
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
United Kingdom · Elsevier Ltd
workspace_premium Q1 — Medicine (miscellaneous) lock_open Open Access

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences is a journal indexed in SJR in Medicine (miscellaneous) and History and Philosophy of Science with an H index of 50. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,472 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,472.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: case, biology, habsburg, synthetic, modeling, monarchy, improvement, psychological, extrapolation, reductionism, ...

ISSN: 1369-8486
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Category: Medicine (miscellaneous)
open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guidelines NPD
schedule CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact Factor trending_up
0,472 Q1
H-index 50
Acceptance rate pie_chart
32%
Source Acceptance_Rate
Time to publication hourglass_top
NPD
Field NPD
Publication cost (APC) payments
NPD Open Access
Non-OA path 0 €

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

SJR Impact

0,472

H-index

50

Docs (year)

0

Docs 3y

53

Total refs

0

Cites 3y

93

Citable 3y

50

Cites/Doc 2y

0

Ref/Doc

0.0

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

0 €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims
rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.
User
* Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Community (Net) Work

View more

Who needs bioethicists?

View more

From Genes to Eugenics

View more

Freaks of nature: images of Barbara McClintock

View more

Foreign expertise, political pragmatism and professional elite: The Rockefeller Foundation in Spain, 1919-39

View more

Folk psychology meets the frame problem

View more

Evolution and belief: the missing question

View more

Desmond/ Huxley : the hot-blooded historian Although his world view ultimately sank into orthodoxy, he never lost his love of battle. 1 1Desmond (1975) p. 234. The reference is to Thomas Huxley.

View more

Design, Development and Decisions

View more

Darwin, Tegetmeier and the bees

View more

Credibility@Feminist.Epistemology

View more

Could religion be a group-level adaptation of Homo sapiens?

View more
SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Confused meanings of life, genes and parents

View more

`The complete biography of every animal': ants, bees, and humanity in nineteenth-century England

View more

Classes or Individuals? The Paradox of Systematics Revisited

View more

Burgeoning visions of global public health: The Rockefeller Foundation, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the 'Hookworm Connection'

View more

Brain-mind identities in dualism and materialism: a historical perspective

View more

Boyle on seminal principles

View more

Bones that matter: Sex determination in paleodemography 1948-1995

View more

Bioethics and conflicts of interest

View more

Are there scientific goals?

View more

An overloaded ark? The Rockefeller Foundation and refugee medical scientists, 1933-45

View more

American Palaeontology and the reception of Darwinism

View more

A spiritual leader? Cambridge zoology, mountaineering and the death of F.M. Balfour

View more

FAQs