verified COP 8,6 · D1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed

United States · American Psychological Assoc...

workspace_premium D1 Top 10% — History and Philosophy of Science lock Subscription

Psychological Methods

Psychological Methods is a journal indexed in SJR in History and Philosophy of Science and Psychology (miscellaneous) with an H index of 195. It has a COP Index of 8,6 (best band D1). It is published in English. It has a COP Index of 8,6.

ISSN: 1082-989X

Publisher: American Psychological Association

Category: History and Philosophy of Science

Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guidelines NPD

schedule CountryOfPapers database fields

COP Index trending_up

8,6 D1 Top 10%

3 of 152 journals in History and Philosophy of Science

H-index · SJR 195 · 4,925

Acceptance rate pie_chart

15% Highly selective

Source Acceptance_Rate

Time to publication hourglass_top

NPD

Field NPD

Publication cost (APC) payments

NPD Subscription

Non-OA path NPD

Metrics

Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

COP Index

8,6

D1 Top 10%

SJR Impact

4,925

H-index

195

Docs (year)

Docs 3y

285

Total refs

5714

Cites 3y

2664

Citable 3y

284

Cites/Doc 2y

8.19

Ref/Doc

67.22

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

—

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims

rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.

Publication speed *

Review quality *

Edition and editorial team *

Institutional email or ORCID * * Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

A Note on Testing for Homogeneity Among Effect Sizes Sharing a Common Control Group.

When fit indices and residuals are incompatible.

Combining independent p values: Extensions of the Stouffer and binomial methods.

Clusterwise simultaneous component analysis for analyzing structural differences in multivariate multiblock data.

Clustering Binary Data in the Presence of Masking Variables.

Causal inference in randomized experiments with mediational processes.

Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings.

Building path diagrams for multilevel models.

Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal designs.

A trifactor model for integrating ratings across multiple informants.

A Realistic Perspective on Pattern Representation in Growth Data: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003).

A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.

SHOW MORE ARTICLES

A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus.

"Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha"": Correction."

A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis.

A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.

A Latent Markov Model for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data Collected in Continuous Time: States, Durations, and Transitions.

A double bootstrap method to analyze linear models with autoregressive error terms.

A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models.

A comparison of procedures to test for moderators in mixed-effects meta-regression models.

A comparison of methods for estimating quadratic effects in nonlinear structural equation models.

A coefficient alpha for test-retest data.

"Repeated-Measures Contrasts for ""Multiple-Pattern"" Hypotheses."

"Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models"": Clarification to Bauer and Hussong (2009)."

FAQs

Psychological Methods has a COP Index of 8,6 (D1), ranked 3 of 152 in History and Philosophy of Science. SJR: 4,925.

Immediate OA APC is not available (NPD).

The acceptance rate recorded for Psychological Methods is 15%.

Psychological Methods

Metrics

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Researcher reviews

Best articles by citations

FAQs

What is the COP Index of Psychological Methods?

What is the APC / publication cost?

What is the acceptance rate?