European Journal for Philosophy of Science
European Journal for Philosophy of Science is a journal indexed in SJR in History and Philosophy of Science with an H index of 32. It has a price of 2190 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,971 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 0,971.
Metrics
Scimago and CountryOfPapers database fields
SJR Impact
0,971
H-index
32
Docs (year)
62
Docs 3y
241
Total refs
3775
Cites 3y
516
Citable 3y
238
Cites/Doc 2y
2.04
Ref/Doc
60.89
Immediate OA
2190 €
Embargoed OA
NPD
Non OA / Submission
0 €
Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.
Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.
Researcher reviews
Best articles by citations
Choice models and realistic ontologies: three challenges to neuro-psychological modellers
View moreWhat's so special about empirical adequacy?
View moreDoes quantum mechanics clash with the equivalence principle - and does it matter?
View moreDesign sans adaptation
View moreDerivational robustness, credible substitute systems and mathematical economic models: the case of stability analysis in Walrasian general equilibrium theory
View moreDefending the Semantic View: what it takes
View moreDecoupling emergence and reduction in physics
View moreDecision theory and cognitive choice
View moreCorrection to: "Dealing with the changeable and blurry edges of living things: a modified version of property-cluster kinds"
View moreConvergent evolution and the limits of natural selection
View moreContrastive statistical explanation and causal heterogeneity
View moreConfirmation, increase in probability, and partial discrimination: A reply to Zalabardo
View moreChunk and permeate II: Bohr's hydrogen atom
View moreA (Fatal) Trilemma for best theory realism
View moreCausal closure of the physical, mental causation, and physics
View moreCategory theory and physical structuralism
View moreCarnap's ramseyfications defended
View moreBest theory scientific realism
View moreBackwards explanation and unification
View moreAre computer simulations experiments? And if not, how are they related to each other?
View moreAre climate models credible worlds? Prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction
View moreAmending and defending Critical Contextual Empiricism
View moreA weaker condition for transitivity in probabilistic support
View moreA note on "The no alternatives argument" by Richard Dawid, Stephan Hartmann and Jan Sprenger
View more