verified SJR 1,293 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed

United Kingdom · SAGE Publications Ltd

workspace_premium Q1 — History and Philosophy of Science visibility_off Double blind Peer Review lock_open Open Access Unclaimed

Social Studies of Science

Social Studies of Science is a journal indexed in SJR in History and Philosophy of Science and Social Sciences (miscellaneous) with an H index of 110. Journal with a Double blind Peer Review review system The scope of the journal is focused on Social, History, Philosophy. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,293 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,293.

Social Studies of Science focuses its scope in these topics and keywords: embryo, objects, hazards, formula, federal, climate, street, single, plural, killed, ...

ISSN: 0306-3127

Editorial: SAGE Publications Ltd

Category: History and Philosophy of Science

Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Visitar Portal de la Editorial menu_book Guía para Autores (Guidelines)

schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD

SJR Impact Factor trending_up

1,293 Q1

H-index 110

Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart

25% Selectiva

Fuente Acceptance_Rate

Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top

NPD

Campo Sin dato

Coste de Publicación (APC) payments

NPD Open Access

Ruta Non-OA 0 €

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

1,293

H-index

110

Docs (year)

Docs 3y

130

Total refs

3883

Cites 3y

529

Citable 3y

122

Cites/Doc 2y

3.82

Ref/Doc

73.26

Immediate OA

—

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

0 €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims

rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.

Publication speed *

Review quality *

Edition and editorial team *

Institutional email or ORCID * * Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Civil skepticism' and the social construction of knowledge: A case in dendroclimatology

Writings of Robert K. Merton

Cultures of Proving

Crossing Boundaries

Creating energy citizenship through material participation

Creating a New Object of Government

Crafting the group: Care in research management

Counting, accounting, and accountability: Helen Verran's relational empiricism

Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge

Contested Identities

Considering the Role of the University in Conducting Research on Agri-biotechnologies

Comments on Lynn Eden's Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, & Nuclear Weapons Devastation

SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Classifying Microorganisms:

A Deductive Explanation of the Matthew Effect in Science

California Noise

Broken tempos: Of means and memory in a Senegalese university laboratory

Book Review: Modern Sounds

Book Review: Making Science and Technology Studies Relevant for Technology Policy - Gains and Losses?

Autonomy's End

Anyone can edit', not everyone does: Wikipedia's infrastructure and the gender gap

Anti-social Epistemologies

Actor and analyst: A response to Coopmans and Button

A Step Toward the Legalization of Science Studies

A Prescription for Psychiatry

FAQS

In Country of Papers you can find SJR impact factor and other metrics to help you decide on a Journal.