verified SJR 1,064 · Q1 • database Scopus / SJR & Web of Science indexed

United Kingdom · John Wiley and Sons Ltd

workspace_premium Q1 — Strategy and Management lock_open Open Access Unclaimed

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is a journal indexed in SJR in Strategy and Management and Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) with an H index of 96. It has a price of 2083 €. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,064 and it has a best quartile of Q1. It is published in English. It has an SJR impact factor of 1,064.

ISSN: 0894-3257

Editorial: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

Category: Strategy and Management

Indexation: verifiedScopus / SJR verifiedWeb of Science

Unclaimed profile — some fields may be incomplete.

open_in_new Portal NPD menu_book Guidelines NPD

schedule Datos CoP · solo campos en BD

SJR Impact Factor trending_up

1,064 Q1

H-index 96

Tasa de Aceptación pie_chart

26% Selectiva

Fuente Acceptance_Rate

Tiempo a publicación hourglass_top

NPD

Campo Sin dato

Coste de Publicación (APC) payments

2.083 € Open Access

Ruta Non-OA 0 €

Metrics

Campos Scimago / CoP — sin series inventadas

Scopus / SJR Web of Science

SJR Impact

1,064

H-index

Docs (year)

Docs 3y

144

Total refs

3785

Cites 3y

367

Citable 3y

144

Cites/Doc 2y

2.11

Ref/Doc

61.05

Immediate OA

2083 €

Embargoed OA

NPD

Non OA / Submission

0 €

shield Researcher voice

Name good journals. Call out predatory ones.

Share what peer review, fees, and timelines were really like. Praise fair editors. Flag APC traps, fake metrics, or spam solicitations — with facts from your submission.

Fair & fast peer review Clear APC / no surprise fees Suspected predatory Fake impact claims

rate_review Write an honest review

Researcher reviews

sentiment_dissatisfied No reviews yet — be the first to share an honest experience.

Publication speed *

Review quality *

Edition and editorial team *

Institutional email or ORCID * * Only to validate authenticity — identity is not shown publicly.

Best articles by citations

Choices, values and frames, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 840 pp., ISBN 0521627494 (pb), 0521621720 (hc)

Why Do We Want to Delay Actions on Climate Change? Effects of Probability and Timing of Climate Consequences

Do Bettors Correctly Perceive Odds? Three Studies of How Bettors Interpret Betting Odds as Probabilistic Information

Different measures of risk perceptions yield different patterns of interaction for combinations of hazards: smoking, family history and cardiac events

Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale

Determinants of the magnitude of willingness to accept relative to willingness to pay

De-escalation after repeated negative feedback: emergent expectations of failure

Commonalities and Differences Among Frames: A Unification Model

Combining advice: the weight of a dissenting opinion in the consensus

Cognitive Reflection Predicts Real-Life Decision Outcomes, but Not Over and Above Personality and Decision-Making Styles

Clouds make nerds look good: field evidence of the impact of incidental factors on decision making

Clarification Regarding Rand et al. (2015) "Social Context and the Dynamics of Cooperative Choice"

SHOW MORE ARTICLES

Choosing Across Cultures: The Effect of Choice Complexity on Treatment Outcomes

A Goal-Priming Approach to Cognitive Consistency: Applications to Judgment

Choice, Rating, and Ranking: Framing Effects with Different Response Modes

Bigger is better: the influence of physical size on aesthetic preference judgments

Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: a simulation study

An Optimized Design of Choice Experiments: A New Approach for Studying Decision Behavior in Choice Task Experiments

An experimental analysis of decision channeling by restrictive information display

An advantage model of choice

Age Differences in Risk: Perceptions, Intentions and Domains

Action, inaction, and factors influencing perceived decision making

Acting for the Greater Good: Identification with Group Determines Choices in Sequential Contribution Dilemmas

Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims

FAQS

In Country of Papers you can find SJR impact factor and other metrics to help you decide on a Journal.